The stuff I do

Migrating my CI from Travis-CI to Github Actions

- 1220 words -

← Posts

Last November travis-ci announced a change in their pricing policy and that made me think about changing the CI environment I use for this website. After procrastinating on this topic for a few months I finally switched to Github Actions here's why and how I did it.

Why changing? 🔗

When I created this website I needed to setup a CI environment which would build the site using the static generator eleventy before it gets deployed to Github Pages. I wanted a tool which would be:

I had already used travis on a previous side project and I knew I could make something work pretty easily, especially because I had already an account set up. So I didn't give it too much thoughts and started creating my .travis-ci.yml file. And I have to say that after about 200 commits and 8 months of use I am still mostly satisfied this their service.

The only trouble I had with travis was a few months ago when they decided to enforce the migration of all the open source repos from to I was annoyed because my build suddenly broke and I had to do the migration when I wasn't planning to do it. In their defense though the migration was announced since 2018 and I was in fault for not seeing the notices (or most likely forgetting about them). Also it was a minor pain as the migration was fairly straight forward.

With travis' new pricing policy each open source project has a finite amount of credits to use for their builds and once they are out of credit, the maintainer needs to email the travis team to ask for more credits. Considering how many credits I consumed since the change is effective I estimate that I would run out of credits in roughly 3 years: Who has time to send an email every 3 years for their side project? 🙄

Ok, maybe that wouldn't be too much of an issue and I understand travis policy: In the end a company needs to make money to provide good products. But still, I was curious to experiment with Github Actions as they seem pretty popular currently, are better integrated with my project which is already hosted on Github and are completely free for what I want to do (at least for now).

My CI workflow 🔗

Before having a look at what changed let's see what my CI workflow needs to do.

It is a pretty straight forward process with three main steps:

To do that I had a 20 lines travis-ci.yml file which looked like this:

language: node_js
    - 'stable'
        - node_modules

    # Script to generate the issue in github used for comments
    - npm run create-issues -- $GITHUB_TOKEN false
    - npm run build

    provider: pages
    skip_cleanup: true
    github_token: $GITHUB_TOKEN
    keep_history: true
        branch: master
    local_dir: docs/

For all of this to work properly I had to generate a personal access token, store it in my repository secrets and copy it in my travis CI settings to be able to call the Github API to create issues and to commit my changes.

What changed? 🔗

Because my workflow is very simple (no tests to run, no linting, etc...) moving it to Github Actions was pretty quick, it took me about 20 minutes to get it to work.

First I got rid of the .travis.yml file to avoid running both pipelines at the same time and I created a .github/workflow/deploy.yml file:

name: deploy
    branches: [ master ]
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
      - name: 🔀 Checkout
        uses: actions/checkout@v2
      - name: 🚩 Configure node
        uses: actions/setup-node@v1
          node-version: '12'
      - name: 🔧 Install and build
        run: |
          npm ci
          npm run build
      - name: 💬 Create issues for comments
        run: npm run create-issues -- ${{ secrets.ACCESS_TOKEN }} false
      - name: 🚀 Deploy
        uses: JamesIves/github-pages-deploy-action@4.0.0
          branch: gh-pages # The branch the action should deploy to.
          folder: docs # The folder the action should deploy.
          token: ${{ secrets.ACCESS_TOKEN }}

The name block is only to set up the name of the action which will be shown in the UI

deploy workflow

Note that the main difference here compared to the travis configuration is that my access token was already in the secrets of my repository so I could access it directly with ${{ secrets.ACCESS_TOKEN }} without additional config.

Takeaway 🔗

My experience with switching my CI to Github Actions has been pretty positive. The whole process is very well documented by Github, there are a lot of actions available on the market place which "just work", and for now it's completely free for my project.

Even if that means relying even more on a Microsoft product -which I'm not exactly happy about- that is easily counterbalanced by the how easy to use it is.

← Posts

Related posts

Posts in the same category: [meta]


Back to top